Register Now    All Threads    The Rules    About Forum
DailyFX Calendar DailyFX Charts DailyFX News DailyFX Blogs DailyFX Forum
  #7246 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 12:27 AM
justy10125's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 811
justy10125 is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulcheung View Post
Hi,
Is it time for this pair moving up?
Where do you think it's headed?
Reply With Quote
  #7247 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 12:47 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 143
paulcheung is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by justy10125 View Post
Where do you think it's headed?
Hi justy,
I guess short term will go up?
Reply With Quote
  #7248 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 12:54 AM
justy10125's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 811
justy10125 is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulcheung View Post
Hi justy,
I guess short term will go up?
Based on what?
Reply With Quote
  #7249 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 12:59 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 590
broyboy is an unknown quantity at this point
Looking ahead to the US session, I think longs are the better play. Lehman will reassure investors (already in after hours trading it is ~$.50 above the closing price), TI announced better than anticipated earnings, Google announced TV ads, Steve Jobs is not dying, and Fedex boosted profit forecast.

Technically, GBP/USD looks ready to rocket higher while USD/JPY appears ready for another bounce within the choppy downtrend. GBP/JPY has held post-NFP lows in Asia and bounced 150 pips with a nice 3 point uptrend line now in place.

We are in consolidative mode until the next event. Buy dips and sell rips. Myself, I am long at 188.11, looking for 192.

I see we are now testing the downtrend line from post Franny high... took some profit... a break above increases short term bullish conviction.

Last edited by broyboy; 09-10-2008 at 01:12 AM. Reason: Took some profit on long
Reply With Quote
  #7250 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 01:04 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 640
DollarBull is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by justy10125 View Post
The government has guaranteed that the $12 trillion worth of home loans owned and insured by Fannie and Freddie won't default. Had those two companies gone under and those loans would have defaulted, who would have been left with the bill? The banks. But now, thanks to the U.S. government, the burden has been spread to the taxpayers.
Why the bloody hell should a taxpayer like me take on YOUR debt burden just because fools signed up for exhorbitant home mortgages and greedy underwriters went on an irresponsible spree?

Quote:

Most people look at this as some awful thing, but each individual taxpayer won't be affected too much. There's enough people in the United States that the load can be spread out. People are just getting all spun up for no reason other than to complain.
That is nonsense. You think people aren't complaining about high taxes in US?
Quote:

Another issue that would arise if Fannie and Freddie were to go under would be who would buy and insure all of the mortgages? Remember that combined those two companies own over half of all mortgages in the U.S.
Do you honesty even understand the bailout? It has nothing to do with who pays and who collects mortgages. It is about SAVING THE BONDHOLDERS!!! If Fannae Mae and Freddie Mac filed for bankruptcy the only consequence would be THE BONDHOLDERS WON'T GET PAID! Nothing will stop the regular mortgage payments, defaults, missed payments, notices, collections or whatsoever of the operations of these companies!!! Jeez, can't some of you people even TRY to understand who is being protected?

Quote:
The country is already in a bad situation with the real estate market as it is. Now imagine if Fannie/Freddie weren't there to buy those mortgages. The banks sure couldn't afford to front all of the money to homeowners by themselves. The banking industry is struggling as well. So in the end, things for the banks, and the real estate market, and the economy in general would have been far worse.
1. Scare Tactics.

2. Bailout has nothing to do with homeowners!!! Their payments are not decreased. No changes!!!
Quote:

Another thing... Under the plan the government set up, they are helping Fannie and Freddie get back on track (which is a good thing). They are making the companies reduce their size and debt. And they have instituted a host of other stipulations to help them out. As the companies start making money again, they are going to be paying back the government, so there again the taxpayers won't be out all that much.

Sounds like a pretty good deal to me.
All BS explanations fed to common people to take on more debt owned by someone else. If you went to a bank for a $100 loan to bail you out you have to explain how you are going 'start making money again' and how you are going to pay back to the bank. Nothing whatsoever was detailed by these companies to the government. Or, why dont YOU explain when they are going to be paying back the government? Amortization? Term sheets? Timeline? Collateral?

Same scare tactics that sky is falling when Bear Stearns went belly up. Fed had to tell congress to urgently write a law during a weekend because SCARE TACTICS if we don't act SKY WILL FALL ON US... and if we don't bailout Fannae Mae SKY WILL FALL ON US and if we don't bail out (coming soon to a theater near you) LEHMAN BROTHERS SKY WILL FALL ON US...

Last edited by DollarBull; 09-10-2008 at 01:06 AM. Reason: quote error
Reply With Quote
  #7251 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 01:57 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 590
broyboy is an unknown quantity at this point
Dollarbull:

I must disagree with you on the consequences of a Franny failure (that is, the inability to roll over debt). There are two arguments for saving Franny.

First reason for bailout is political: foreign governmental entities hold a lot of this debt. If they don't get paid back, it seems to me that would be a failure of the wink and nod promise to back that debt and this would negatively impact the creditworthiness and credibility of the US government. I for one don't like the thought of our credibility throughout the world declining any more than it already has.

Second reason is economic: the ripple effects would be catastrophic. Franny alone was keeping home lending going. It's not about their current holdings; it's about their ability to continue buying. Without them the cost of a mortgage would skyrocket. Who could fill the void to lend? Home prices would plummet. Credit spreads would rise. Lending activity would cease. Risk aversion would spike and extreme stress would be put on leveraged firms and bad positions. The economy would grind to a halt.

While one could argue this all would be a natural consequence of free market capitalism and should be left alone, what's unnatural about this particular situation is that no private company would have gotten so big and yet so undercapitalized without such implicit backing by the government. The reality is that it's time to put an end to this odd model of private realization of gains but public realization of losses.

Already we have seen positive effects from the bailout: mortage interest rates have dropped significantly.

With all due respect, I think you underestimate the importance of the real estate industry and availability of credit as the backbone of the US economy. If we can put government to work to help people at a minimal cost, and maybe a profit in a few years, why not?

Last edited by broyboy; 09-10-2008 at 02:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7252 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 02:14 AM
Rix's Avatar
Rix Rix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 202
Rix is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by justy10125 View Post
That's wasn't due to a restriction of a broker. That's just the way stop and limit orders work. If you have a stop loss order to cover a short position at say 191.00 and price is trading at 190.50, if price were to gap up over your stop-loss to 191.75 then your stop shouldn't be executed. The stop order is only executed if price touches it, and if you are gapped over the order never gets touched. If you have the option available, it's better to use a stop market order. Most FX bucket shops don't offer that option though. If you do it that way, then the stop order will be filled at or above (In the case of a short) the price you set. That's just one of the risks of holding positions over the weekend. I've been burned by that before as well. It sucks.
That makes sense...just wish i knew that before

Quote:
Originally Posted by paulcheung View Post
Hi,
Is it time for this pair moving up?
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulcheung View Post
HI Maratha,
The 195.50 be tested now, do you think when EU open will push this pair higher?
Paul
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulcheung View Post
What do you guys say? are we bottom out for now? 800PIPs up from Friday low?

Paul...Why not stop asking stupid questions and get yourself educated in order for you to do you own analysis!


Last edited by Rix; 09-10-2008 at 02:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7253 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 02:18 AM
justy10125's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 811
justy10125 is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rix View Post
That makes sense...just wish i knew that before
I wish more FX bucket shops offered stop market orders rather than just the normal stop orders. I've been caught a couple different times where price gapped over my stop and I wasn't around to catch it in time. A stop market order would fix that issue. That's the way it goes I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #7254 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 02:22 AM
Rix's Avatar
Rix Rix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 202
Rix is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by justy10125 View Post
I wish more FX bucket shops offered stop market orders rather than just the normal stop orders. I've been caught a couple different times where price gapped over my stop and I wasn't around to catch it in time. A stop market order would fix that issue. That's the way it goes I guess.
Hmmm will have to look into that

Meantime im heading for bed, gn all...
Reply With Quote
  #7255 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 02:45 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8
CJ Modiano is an unknown quantity at this point
Rix, please save those childish and personally insulting pictures to some BS yahoo message board. Let's keep this message board down to business only.
Reply With Quote
  #7256 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 02:53 AM
justy10125's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 811
justy10125 is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by DollarBull View Post
Why the bloody hell should a taxpayer like me take on YOUR debt burden just because fools signed up for exhorbitant home mortgages and greedy underwriters went on an irresponsible spree?

That is nonsense. You think people aren't complaining about high taxes in US?

I didn't say that we should be excited to take the tax burden. I didn't say the the middle/upper class were looking forward to paying more taxes. My point, one which you completely disregarded and blew way out of proportion but that's okay anyway, is that there isn't going to be a huge liquidation of those two companies. By spreading the burden to the taxpayers, if that's even the case, it's at least supporting the economy for the time being. And that's the point. The government is trying to slow down the death spiral. If you're really that hard up for the few dollars it will cost you personally, I'll help you out. I'm sure I've got some spare change floating around somewhere.


Quote:
Originally Posted by DollarBull View Post
Do you honesty even understand the bailout? It has nothing to do with who pays and who collects mortgages. It is about SAVING THE BONDHOLDERS!!! If Fannae Mae and Freddie Mac filed for bankruptcy the only consequence would be THE BONDHOLDERS WON'T GET PAID! Nothing will stop the regular mortgage payments, defaults, missed payments, notices, collections or whatsoever of the operations of these companies!!! Jeez, can't some of you people even TRY to understand who is being protected?
If Fannie and Freddie went belly up, then who would buy any new mortgages? Who would insure them? In a market where things are as shaky as they are right now, it's important that those companies remain in a position to keep doing the thing they were intended to do. They are there to provide local banks with federal money to finance American mortgages.


Quote:
Originally Posted by DollarBull View Post
2. Bailout has nothing to do with homeowners!!! Their payments are not decreased. No changes!!!
Actually it has a lot to do with homeowners. If Freddie and Fannie weren't there to buy the mortgages in the secondary mortgage market, then where would HOMEOWNERS get the loan money? From the magical money tree? Local banks sure wouldn't be able to just front the money to each person who wants to borrow money for a home. That's why these two companies need to remain in business.


Quote:
Originally Posted by DollarBull View Post
Or, why dont YOU explain when they are going to be paying back the government? Amortization? Term sheets? Timeline? Collateral?
All I've read so far is that Paulson wants them to reduce the size of their companies starting in 2010. And I've also read that the companies were going to start making payments back to the government.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DollarBull View Post
Same scare tactics that sky is falling when Bear Stearns went belly up. Fed had to tell congress to urgently write a law during a weekend because SCARE TACTICS if we don't act SKY WILL FALL ON US... and if we don't bailout Fannae Mae SKY WILL FALL ON US and if we don't bail out (coming soon to a theater near you) LEHMAN BROTHERS SKY WILL FALL ON US...
Margin calls and mass liquidation are what caused the price to fall so fast during the 1929 stock market crash. You ever heard of Black Monday? That was due to margin calls/mass liquidation. The tech bubble... Same thing. If Fannie and Freddie were to all of a sudden fail, you can bet the same sort of thing would happen. That's what the government was trying to prevent. It's really not that hard to understand. But if it makes you feel good to get all huffy and puffy about it then go ahead. Have fun.
Reply With Quote
  #7257 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 03:00 AM
Maratha's Avatar
100 Post Club
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,387
Maratha is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Maratha Send a message via Yahoo to Maratha
Dear All,

My long from 189 was stopped out at b/e sometime in US session. Looking at price now, have reentered the long at 188.25 with stop at 187.75 and target of 190 (first) and 195 (second)...

There seems to be good support around 187 area as of now. Let's see if that reflects into a good rally for GBPJPY or not...I'm still targeting 200 area for this move...let's see.
__________________
"The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent" - Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #7258 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 03:37 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 143
paulcheung is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by justy10125 View Post
Based on what?
HI,
Few atempt to break 187.500 area and didn't go through, maybe that will hold for now? Justy, Price range like this which technical indicators are you use to find the direction?
Thank you.
Paul
Reply With Quote
  #7259 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 03:45 AM
justy10125's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 811
justy10125 is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulcheung View Post
HI,
Few atempt to break 187.500 area and didn't go through, maybe that will hold for now? Justy, Price range like this which technical indicators are you use to find the direction?
Thank you.
Paul
The EMA's and MACD's on the daily and weekly are still pointing lower. That's the direction I'm using until one of those conditions is no longer pointing lower.

Last edited by justy10125; 09-10-2008 at 03:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7260 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2008, 03:47 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 143
paulcheung is an unknown quantity at this point
Hi Justy,
What number do you use on the MACD to confirm the trend? The daily?my software come default with 12, 26, 9.
The daily on the EMA5, 21 still say down trend, and the MACD also said down with the 12,26,9. So what do you say?
Thanks
Paul
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:23 AM.



Disclaimer: Trading foreign exchange on margin carries a high level of risk, and may not be suitable for all investors. The high degree of leverage can work against you as well as for you. Before deciding to trade foreign exchange you should carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite. The possibility exists that you could sustain a loss of some or all of your initial investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with foreign exchange trading, and seek advice from an independent financial advisor if you have any doubts.

Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices, or other information contained on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. Forex Capital Markets LLC. will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information.

Advertencia sobre Riesgos
©2007 DailyFX. All Rights Reserved. FXCM.COM  |  Contact Us  |  Currency Converter  |  Risk Disclaimer & Privacy Policy



Copyright ©2005 Daily FX. All Rights Reserved.